Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Women's Suffrage

“That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons that history has to teach.”
-Aldous Huxley



http://www.flickr.com/photos/16041363@N00/2371671927

            What is the purpose of learning about history? I always thought it was to have a better understanding of the world around us, and to see what has gotten us to where we are, in order to properly determine where we are going. In certain cases, I was wrong. We are taught about wars and revolutions that occurred so many years ago, based on a number of factors that one would assume should have taught us something. The reality is that history repeats itself, and it is not always for good reason.




Image: 'Seneca Falls, NY
http://www.flickr.com/photos/51109667@N00/1818162121


              

Journalism is the tool that makes history possible, or in some cases close to impossible. In the eighteenth-century, a woman’s role was known by all to be small. A woman’s role was to please her husband, bear children, and not to have thoughts of her own. Then one day, a happily married mother of seven children named Elizabeth Cady Stanton decided that this wasn’t right. In 1815 she planned an event would later become known as the beginning of the Women’s Rights Movement. In Seneca Falls, New York, 300 people gathered for a two-day convention that produced a Declaration of Sentiments. This declaration demanded that women have the same rights as men whether it is in the workplace, or at home.


              At the time, respected journalists were men who saw this “movement” as comical, and often mocked what Stanton and her followers aimed to accomplish. The seemingly insignificant convention in Seneca Falls would later become known as the beginning of Women’s Suffrage. Although it wouldn't happen for seventy-two years, supporters never lost sight of their goal: Women should have the same rights as men. In 1815, the social norm was that a woman’s place was in the home, and until Stanton came along it was something no one dared to question. Humans tend to reject the unfamiliar no matter how much it might make sense.

The same types of logical thoughts were met with laughter and distaste when the rights of same-sex couples were first brought up. According to the 2000 census, there were 594,391 same-sex couples living together in the United States, yet none could marry. According to an article on www.now.org (National Organization for Women) written by Amanda Cherrin, same-sex couples across the country are denied more than 1,000 federal protections and rights. Many reasons I've heard that people reject same-sex marriage without hesitation is a matter of religion. They want to protect the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman, the “sanctity” that homosexual couples will destroy. In my opinion, it’s people like Kim Kardashian who get married, then get divorced seventy-two days later that are ruining the sanctity of marriage. In the same article NOW action Vice President Olga Vives said "We need to educate the people of this country- they need to know that the denial of same-sex marriage is discrimination".

Image: 'Providence Pride - June 16
http://www.flickr.com/photos/20838991@N00/656532140

The close-mindedness that largely slowed down progress in the fight for women’s rights is the same thing that is making the fight for gay rights that much more difficult. Due to the difference in time and technology it won’t take seventy-two years for advocates to achieve their goal, but even with all sorts of social networking it has taken a lot of time. Women’s suffrage was before my time, and I don’t have a direct tie to the fight for same-sex marriage but I often try to put myself in their shoes. I know what it’s like to work towards making something right, and I can’t imagine how I would feel if I was denied things like the right to vote or the right to marry whomever I wanted.

The media has slowed the progress of both movements, thanks to people with a voice who can’t seem to let go of what they know and accept a little bit of change, especially when it is what’s right. I think that the gay rights movement has made great strides in the past couple of years, as six state governments as well as the District of Columbia have passed laws offering same-sex marriage. Hopefully the people of this country will realize that we are repeating history, and that one day we can use media and journalism to do what’s right by the citizens of this country.




Same-Sex Marriage: The Fight for Equality Gains Momentum

12 comments:

  1. It's discouraging. I really feel like people just don't want to advance culturally, intellectually, or emotionally as individuals sometimes. Just because they don't like change. It's great that some of these movements are gaining popularity and changing minds though.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that your insight on this topic is inspiring. The connection between women's suffrage and the gay rights movement truly do connect on many different levels. It is sad that we keep repeating history and even worse, that we can't recognize it. I hope that more people will get on board with same-sex marriage, and I also hope that when fighting for same sex marriage, people use more facts in their arguments rather than just emotions. Congress (especially republicans) respond to fact and logistics. They never respond to emotional arguments. Of course there is a reason to get emotional, especially when you don't have the same rights as other people just because you are gay, but every fight needs a to present the facts before the emotions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. very powerful blog so far, this has really put an emphasis on the struggle woman went through during the woman's rights movement

    ReplyDelete
  4. Allison is correct about the evolution of the role of women in our country. I disagree, however, with comparing the status of gays/lesbians (and transsexuals for that matter) with women in the late 1800's to the early 1900's. The former is more accurately compared to ethnic minorities.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with Alison's sentiments that the media controls, for the better or worse, how people view the major rights struggles we have faced as a country. For example during the Civil Rights movement, the southern media controlled images of lynchings and general brutality againdst blacks that could have turned the Civil Rights tide many years earlier if they were published. Thank God we had a President(LBJ) who was willing to sacrifice his party's hold on the electoral south so that minorities could share in the same basic rights that all other(white) Americans had. Unfortunately, much progress we make as a nation comes with much suffering.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I very much liked Alison's comment regarding the sanctity of marriage, 'In my opinion, it’s people like Kim Kardashian who get married, then get divorced seventy-two days later that are ruining the sanctity of marriage.'I couldn't agree more!-GBH

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think Alison's idea of connecting women's rights and the suffrage movement to the civil rights issues we face to day, as a nation, is intriguing and thought provoking. Keep blogging Ali.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well organized layout of your posts. I can feel the connection and emotion within your text making me want to read more and more. Great start looking forward to see more post.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Are you sure you want to lump "the media" into one unified conservative (and wrong) voice? I suspect The New York Times would object to that.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Well Said Miss Alison!! Hopefully this gets some people to think about the future and use the past as a guide as to how and why some things should or should not be done!

    ReplyDelete
  11. The fact that women were mocked and once seen as "comical," as you described the movement, makes me want to say, "Look at us NOW!" - Climbing business scales, educating children, serving and protecting our country, and the list goes on. The point is women have not only been GIVEN equal opporunity as men, but have PROVEN to accomplish any task that men can. So, if we are all "equal," why can't an equal man marry and equal man, or and equal woman marry an equal woman? The state senate has finally made a step toward accepting same-sex marriage by legalizing it in NY. Others need to be more open-minded. Well Said, Alison!

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is a well thoughtout provocative posting. But Alison I have to tell you. And you can't get around this point with logic. The very post you wrote would not have occured had my friend, your mother chose to abort you. In esoteric spirituality, all life is sacred and even those born with disabilities or conceived by rape or incest have a story to tell. These conditions offer others the opportunity to give of themselves which enriches their lives. In any event, I for one are glad you are here and I am enriched by your presence.

    ReplyDelete